|Own your ow legal marijuana business||
Your guide to making money in the multi-billion dollar marijuana industry
|Carl Olsen's Marijuana Archive|
THE REGISTER'S EDITORIALS
Double standard on drug tests
This little-discussed clause suggests a number of possible explanations: The Iowa General Assembly cares more about the rights of public employees than the rights of private-sector workers. Or, perhaps the public-employee unions won the exemption in some powerful behind-the-scenes horse-trading.
Actually, it was neither.
The reason: As an employer, the government is acting in the role of "The State" and therefore must abide by the structures of the U.S. Constitution. And if you read the not-so-fine print in that document you will find something known as the Fourth Amendment, which says: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. . . ."
It goes on: ". . . and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. . . ."
In short, the framers of the Bill of Rights, who had fresh experience with tyrannical government agents breaking down doors to search homes, insisted that no American government would be allowed to do the same.
For purposes of the Fourth Amendment, a drug test is considered a search. And it makes no difference whether the person searched is an employee of the state or an ordinary citizen. The U.S. Supreme Court has, in recent decisions, ruled that the Constitution allows drug tests of some govemment workers, but those tests have been limited to such safety-sensitive jobs as air-traffic controllers.
Which raises an interesting question: If government workers are protected by the Fourth Amendment - and by the new Iowa drug-testing law - from unreasonable searches without probable cause, that means Iowa state lawmakers approved a drug-testing law that, at least by the standards of the U.S. Supreme Court, permits drug tests of private-sector employees that are unreasonable. That's because the new Iowa law would allow private-sector employers to conduct random drug tests of their employees.
The legislators who voted for this bill knew it did not apply to them in their roles as public employees, to their employees, or to the thousands of people who work for state and local governments in Iowa. And, if Gov. Terry Branstad signs this bill, as expected, it will be with the knowledge that it cannot apply to him or to his staff. It is clearly a double standard - one for public employees, another for private-sector workers.
And that, to borrow a word from the Fourth Amendment, is unreasonable.
Des Moines Register
Schaffer Library of Drug Policy
Major Studies of Drug and Drug Policy
Marihuana, A Signal of Misunderstanding - The Report of the US National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse
Licit and Illicit Drugs
Short History of the Marijuana Laws
The Drug Hang-Up
Congressional Transcripts of the Hearings for the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937
Frequently Asked Questions About Drugs
Basic Facts About the Drug War
Charts and Graphs about Drugs
Information on Alcohol
Guide to Heroin - Frequently Asked Questions About Heroin
LSD, Mescaline, and Psychedelics
Drugs and Driving
Children and Drugs
Drug Abuse Treatment Resource List
American Society for Action on Pain
Let Us Pay Taxes
Marijuana Business News
Reefer Madness Collection
Medical Marijuana Throughout History
Drug Legalization Debate
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition
Marijuana, the First 12,000 Years
DEA Ruling on Medical Marijuana
Legal References on Drugs
GAO Documents on Drugs
Response to the Drug Enforcement Agency
|Drug Information Articles|
Taking a drug test:
How To Pass A Drug Test
Beat Drug Test
Pass Drug Test
Drug Screening Tests
Drug Addiction Treatment