|Own your ow legal marijuana business||
Your guide to making money in the multi-billion dollar marijuana industry
|Marijuana - Medical Information|
U.S. Department of Justice
Drug Enforcement Administration
Rocky Mt. Division
115 Inverness Drive East
Englewood, CO 80112
The Honorable Don Ament, Chairman
Agriculture, Natural Resources & Energy Committee
State Capitol Building
200 East Colfax Ave.
Denver, Colorado 80203
Dear Senator Ament:
I am taking this opportunity to offer , for the record, the Drug Enforcement Administration's views on Senate Bill 95-132, "Hemp Reclassification" which is currently before your Committee.
As the Special Agent in Charge of DEA's Rocky Mountain Field Division, I am charged with enforcement of the Federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in Colorado. In this capacity, it is imperative that I advise you that the "Hemp Reclassification Bill", which attempts to legalize the production of the Cannabis Sativa or Cannabis Indicia, providing the THC content is under 1.4%, violates both the letter and the spirit of the CSA.
Under 21 USC 812 (c) (10), marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance, regardless of the percentage of THC content. The production, distribution or dispensing of marijuana is a felony under federal law pursuant to 21 USC 841. The possession of marijuana is also a federal criminal offense under 21 USC 844.
As you are no doubt aware, in cases where Federal and state law are in opposition, the question of which law would control is well settled. In view of these facts, passage of the "Hemp Reclassification Bill" would have the effect of leading otherwise law abiding farmers down the road to the commission of a felony, under the color of a seriously misguided state statute. If even one honest farmer faces such a dilemma, it would be an insupportable miscarriage of justice.
Beyond the bare facts of the matter on the legality of what this Bill attempts to do, its passage would send a harmful and dysfunctional message to the people of the State of Colorado. A recent nationwide survey conducted by the University of Michigan has shown that the use of marijuana by the nation's school children is on the rise. Enactment of this legislation would add the force of a Colorado statute to the perception that marijuana is "OK."
And let us be clear that what we are talking about in this Bill is marijuana. Calling it "hemp" on the basis of an artificial threshold level of psychoactive ingredient does not erase the fact that it is botanically and legally the same plant. An illegal drug by any other name is still an illegal drug.
The threshold level of THC content which the Bill proposes as the imaginary dividing line between marijuana and hemp communicates another delusional message. No less an authority than Dr. Charles Ksir of the University of Wyoming points out that the marijuana sold of the streets is the 1960s and 1970s was of this strength. To think that those interested in the criminal use and distribution of marijuana would forsake the "hemp" as defined by the Bill is altogether naive.
The claims of the Bill's proponents that Colorado would derive some economic benefit from the commercial production of Cannabis are equally deceptive. In the words of Joseph E. Atchison, Ph.D., an international consultant to the pulp and paper industry, "...it would make far more sense for U.S. Industry to consider returning to the use of agricultural residues which are grown for other purposes, such as wheat straw, seed grass straw and grain sorghum stalks, rather than attempting to grow a plant just for its fiber content, such as kenaf and hemp."
Although I am not an expert in the economics of crop production, I believe that my 31 years as a federal drug agent make me an expert in drug law enforcement. From that standpoint I can tell you that, in my professional opinion, this legislation is no more than a shallow ruse being advanced by those who seek to legalize marijuana. The people of Colorado deserve to be protected from this sort of subterfuge.
The federal criminal law on this subject does provide such protection and will be enforced with all the vigor at DEA's command.
Thank you for giving consideration to my statements on this matter.
Philip W. Perry
Special Agent in Charge
Contents | Feedback | Search | DRCNet Home Page | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library | Hemp (Marijuana)
Schaffer Library of Drug Policy
Major Studies of Drug and Drug Policy
Marihuana, A Signal of Misunderstanding - The Report of the US National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse
Licit and Illicit Drugs
Short History of the Marijuana Laws
The Drug Hang-Up
Congressional Transcripts of the Hearings for the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937
Frequently Asked Questions About Drugs
Basic Facts About the Drug War
Charts and Graphs about Drugs
Information on Alcohol
Guide to Heroin - Frequently Asked Questions About Heroin
LSD, Mescaline, and Psychedelics
Drugs and Driving
Children and Drugs
Drug Abuse Treatment Resource List
American Society for Action on Pain
Let Us Pay Taxes
Marijuana Business News
Reefer Madness Collection
Medical Marijuana Throughout History
Drug Legalization Debate
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition
Marijuana, the First 12,000 Years
DEA Ruling on Medical Marijuana
Legal References on Drugs
GAO Documents on Drugs
Response to the Drug Enforcement Agency
|Drug Information Articles|
Taking a drug test:
How To Pass A Drug Test
Beat Drug Test
Pass Drug Test
Drug Screening Tests
Drug Addiction Treatment