|Own your ow legal marijuana business
Your guide to making money in the multi-billion dollar marijuana industry
|Marijuana - Medical Information
Marinol and Cannabis
Tod H. Mikuriya, M.D.*
Marinol (dronabinol) delta -9 tetrahydrocannabinol dissolved in sesame oil. Supplied in fixed doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 milligram soft gelatin capsules. Taken orally.
Cannabis extract: 9 known delta -9 Tetrahydrocannabinols
2 known delta -8 Tetrahydrocannabinols
50 other cannabinoids that may interact with or modify reactions with the Tetrahydrocannabinols, the primary active principles. Source: Marijuana and Health Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1982, P13-15
Cannabis may be ingested orally or inhaled. Inhalation may be smoked or vaporized.
Anecdotal reports of users of both Marinol and cannabis describe enhancement or constructive supplementation. Others who have tried both have described cannabis as superior to Marinol. Users of cannabis usually inhale.
Oral vs Inhalation: Oral ingestion of either cannabis or Marinol is characterized by:
delayed onset of effects, variable level of effects, and prolonged effects. Inhalation provides quick onset of effects, consistent level of effects, and shorter lasting effects.
The inhalation route is significantly more consistently effective.
Inhalation: Vaporization vs Smoke
Significant irritants and toxic products are produced by combustion which can be minimized by vaporizing Tetrahydrocannabinols and other cannabinoids. Tetrahydrocannabinols vaporize at 400 Fahrenheit. Two crude prototypes have been successfully demonstrated: a modified manually operated auto cigarette lighter element, and a heat gun for electronic shrink tubing set at 400 F. Unfortunately, vaporizers are currently defined by law as illegal paraphernalia.
Clinical Research Needed
Only clinical research comparing Marinol to other Tetrahydrocannabinols and cannabinoids for therapeutic efficacy can clarify this controversy.
Tentative and preliminary clinical findings indicate a significant difference between Marinol and natural crude cannabis preparations in favor of the crude product. Route of administration and fixed incremental dosage may be factors in comparative efficacy and unwanted effects.
Americans for Compassionate Use
March 24, 1994
Contents | Feedback | Search | DRCNet Home Page | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library | Hemp (Marijuana) | Medical Information
Schaffer Library of Drug Policy
Major Studies of Drug and Drug Policy
Marihuana, A Signal of Misunderstanding - The Report of the US National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse
Licit and Illicit Drugs
Short History of the Marijuana Laws
The Drug Hang-Up
Congressional Transcripts of the Hearings for the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937
Frequently Asked Questions About Drugs
Basic Facts About the Drug War
Charts and Graphs about Drugs
Information on Alcohol
Guide to Heroin - Frequently Asked Questions About Heroin
LSD, Mescaline, and Psychedelics
Drugs and Driving
Children and Drugs
Drug Abuse Treatment Resource List
American Society for Action on Pain
Let Us Pay Taxes
Marijuana Business News
Reefer Madness Collection
Medical Marijuana Throughout History
Drug Legalization Debate
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition
Marijuana, the First 12,000 Years
DEA Ruling on Medical Marijuana
Legal References on Drugs
GAO Documents on Drugs
Response to the Drug Enforcement Agency
|Drug Information Articles
Taking a drug test:
How To Pass A Drug Test
Beat Drug Test
Pass Drug Test
Drug Screening Tests
Drug Addiction Treatment