| My opinion of this site is that it STINKS!! It seems that
        you proudly  promote that the D.A.R.E. program does not work.   Thanks for responding.  Perhaps you are put off by the conclusions
        of the people at Research Triangle Institute who did the two year study. Perhaps you did
        not like what the University of Illinois Carbondale Criminal Justice Department had to say
        about DARE.   The Houston PD found that DARE serves basically as a public
        relations vehicle for police views at the expense of the children and under a disguise of
        controlling a public menace. Now that's the conclusion in Houston.  I didn't say it.
        Go tell them they are prejudiced against police.   Maybe it bothers you that Mathea Falco, who is known as a drug war hawk
        with credentials even you would approve, wrote "Making the Grade" in which she
        compared a couple of dozen Drug Prevention, Safety and similar programs and found DARE
        near the bottom in every criteria of evaluation except for "helps kids perceive
        police in a positive light".  Her address is at Drug Strategies
 Wash DC 202-663-6090
 f.202-663-6110
 $12.95 for the book.
 
 Talk to Falco. I disagree with her on most everything else. You will
          probably assume that I agree with her about DARE's failure but who cares what my
        opinion is on this? You are criticizing a list of articles that have appeared nationally
        in front of the brightest and  most influential people, including plenty of cops.  On what facts do you base this opinion? Until you have walked in
        my shoes as a police officer  and a D.A.R.E. instructor you could not possibly draw
        an educated conclusion to this program.  So you think police should evaluate the success of the educational
        program for young children?  Do you think parents and teachers might also have an
        informed opinion on this subject, or only police and politicians?  Police have a
        conflict of interest in presenting these "public service messages".  It is
        very unfortunate, but police cannot accurately assess this program because you are
        prejudiced in favor. Since you claim to be serving the public, let's listen to how the
        public evaluates the program. 
 What would you like to see? Perhaps no type of drug abuse education programs in
        our schools? That would do wonders for our society. The misconception, or should I say
        your ignorance, to the D.A.R.E. program is evident on your site.
 So, are we talking about Ms. Falco, Research Triangle Institute, Houston
        Police Department, University of Illinois or who?  I urge you to present to me any
        documentary evidence you have. I will gladly present in public on my website, under your
        name, your views on this  subject and any supporting material you may have within the
        scope of the website. I will put it up for a year at my expense and invite readers to
        comment, and I will post their comments as well.   It is so sad that our great country's constitution can protect
        liberal swines, since the venom that they spew is considered free press. There is some brightness in thought.
 Dear Sir, you have eloquently and convincingly made my case as to why
        police should not be in front of my children with this message. I am the parent of the
        child you want to teach. I publish scholarly articles on the program which pays your
        salary, and your response is to call me names and threaten me .  There are more of us than of you. Yes. That's what the majority says to the minority. Should I be worried
        that you are not going to come when I need a cop?
 cc Culver City School District    |